The recent decision by Nigeria’s Supreme Court, which granted states exclusive authority to regulate gambling and lottery operations, marks a pivotal moment for the sector in the country. By annulling the National Lottery Act of 2005, the court formally transferred regulatory powers from the federal government to state assemblies, resolving a longstanding dispute between national and state regulators. 

Context 

The decision was based on Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution, which does not include gambling in the Exclusive Legislative List. This omission means that the National Assembly lacks the legal authority to regulate the sector at the national level, except within the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). This argument was central to the case brought by the Lagos State Lotteries and Gaming Authority (LSLGA), alongside other states, challenging the validity of federal laws on lotteries and gambling. Justice Idris Haruna emphasized that the power to legislate on the matter rests solely with the states, deeming the provisions of the National Lottery Act inconsistent with the Constitution. 

Implications for the sector 

With this ruling, states now hold exclusive authority to regulate and oversee gambling activities within their territories. This includes issuing licenses, levying fees, and developing tailored policies to address challenges like gambling addiction and revenue generation. However, the decision also presents challenges for operators, who must adapt to a fragmented regulatory environment with varying requirements and fees across different states. 

The Lagos State Lotteries and Gaming Authority has already announced plans to intensify enforcement, requiring illegal operators to regularize their activities or face prosecution. This approach could set a precedent for other states, incentivizing them to attract licensed operators and expand their tax base. 

Furthermore, the ruling may eliminate the confusion caused by dual state and national tax demands, which previously created uncertainty for operators and regulators. While this represents a victory for the states, it could negatively impact federal government revenue, as it loses a significant source of income. 

International comparisons 

Nigeria is not alone in seeking a more effective regulatory framework for gambling. Countries like the United States and Canada also delegate responsibility to states and provinces, allowing policies to be tailored to local realities. In the U.S., states like Nevada and New Jersey stand out for having more flexible regulations, which have boosted local economies and created jobs. 

Conversely, countries like the United Kingdom centralize regulation through a national body, such as the UK Gambling Commission, ensuring uniformity across the territory. This model reduces complexity for operators but can limit responsiveness to specific regional challenges. 

Opportunities and challenges for Nigeria 

Decentralizing gambling regulation presents opportunities for Nigerian states, enabling them to customize laws to local needs and capitalize on the sector’s revenue potential. However, regulatory fragmentation could lead to operational challenges and necessitate inter-state coordination to avoid extreme policy discrepancies. 

Additionally, the sector faces significant social issues, such as the impact of gambling addiction and the need to protect vulnerable consumers. State governments will need to balance revenue generation with responsible regulations. 

The next SiGMA event is approaching, and the next one is in Dubai! Find more information about SiGMA Eurasia by clicking here.